Einum fremsta rithöfundi samtímans, Nóbelsverðlaunahafanum Günter Grass, er meinað að koma til Ísraels vegna kvæðis sem hann orti um Ísrael, Íran og kjarnorkuvopn. Þetta tilkynnti innanríkisráðherra Ísraels í dag. Yfirskinið er reyndar það að Grass hafi þjónað í Waffen-SS lok stríðsins, en þá var hann 17 ára. Allir vita þó hvað er hér á seyði, það er kvæðið sem skiptir sköpum.
En hvað er svona voðalegt í þessu kvæði? Grass er einfaldlega að benda á að Ísrael hafi átt kjarnorkuvopn um langt skeið, það hafi verið þagnarhjúpur yfir því, að það sé hræsni og að þessi vopn séu ógn við friðinn. Hann viðurkennir að það sé erfitt fyrir Þjóðverja að segja þetta, vegna hyllilegra glæpa fortíðarinnar sem eigi engan sinn líka, en það sé ekki hægt að þegja. Síðan hvetur hann til þess að alþjóðlegt vopnaeftirlit fylgist með kjarnorkuvopnaeign bæði Ísraels og Írans.
Kvæðið er svohljóðandi í enskri þýðingu – og dæmi nú hver fyrir sig:
What must be said
Why have I kept silent, held back so long,
on something openly practiced in
war games, at the end of which those of us
who survive will at best be footnotes?
It’s the alleged right to a first strike
that could destroy an Iranian people
subjugated by a loudmouth
and gathered in organized rallies,
because an atom bomb may be being
developed within his arc of power.
Yet why do I hesitate to name
that other land in which
for years—although kept secret—
a growing nuclear power has existed
beyond supervision or verification,
subject to no inspection of any kind?
This general silence on the facts,
before which my own silence has bowed,
seems to me a troubling lie, and compels
me toward a likely punishment
the moment it’s flouted:
the verdict „Anti-semitism“ falls easily.
But now that my own country,
brought in time after time
for questioning about its own crimes,
profound and beyond compare,
is said to be the departure point,
(on what is merely business,
though easily declared an act of reparation)
for yet another submarine equipped
to transport nuclear warheads
to Israel, where not a single atom bomb
has yet been proved to exist, with fear alone
the only evidence, I’ll say what must be said.
But why have I kept silent till now?
Because I thought my own origins,
Tarnished by a stain that can never be removed,
meant I could not expect Israel, a land
to which I am, and always will be, attached,
to accept this open declaration of the truth.
Why only now, grown old,
and with what ink remains, do I say:
Israel’s atomic power endangers
an already fragile world peace?
Because what must be said
may be too late tomorrow;
and because—burdend enough as Germans—
we may be providing material for a crime
that is foreseeable, so that our complicity
wil not be expunged by any
of the usual excuses.
And granted: I’ve broken my silence
because I’m sick of the West’s hypocrisy;
and I hope too that many may be freed
from their silence, may demand
that those responsible for the open danger
we face renounce the use of force,
may insist that the governments of
both Iran and Israel allow an international authority
free and open inspection of
the nuclear potential and capability of both.
No other course offers help
to Israelis and Palestinians alike,
to all those living side by side in emnity
in this region occupied by illusions,
and ultimately, to all of us.
Hér skrifar svo Jakob Augstein greiningu á þessu ávarpi Grass í Der Spiegel – fyrirsögnin er Hvers vegna við þurfum opna umræðu um Ísrael.
